Questionnaire Report for California Halibut

(MERA version 4.1.6)

Brett van Poorten ()

2019-07-10


1 About this document

This is a prototype of an automatic report that documents how the user specified the operating model and their various justifications.


2 Introduction

  1. Describe the history and current status of the fishery, including fleets, sectors, vessel types and practices/gear by vessel type, landing ports, economics/markets, whether targeted/bycatch, other stocks caught in the fishery. California halibut are targeted by bottom trawl, single-rigged trawl, trawl with foot rope <8 in, hook and line, gill net, and recreational fisheries . Fish are landed at ports along the coast. The species is separated into a south and central stock; delineated by Point Conception. History of the fishery, taken from Appendix 1 of the stock assessment (Historical Management Actions for California Halibut Fisheries.pdf): “1876- The proto-trawl net, known as the paranzella net and which is towed by two boats, is introduced in San Francisco. 1880s- Entangling nets, including trammel nets, are introduced in California. 1911- Trammel nets are prohibited in state waters. 1913- Trammel nets are permitted but required to be pulled within 6 hours. 1913- Trawl nets are prohibited in state waters off the coast of Los Angeles, Ventura, Orange, and San Diego counties. Trawl nets are prohibited within Monterey Bay. 1915- Trawling is prohibited in all state waters. 1915- California halibut less than 4 lbs (1.8 kg) in the round cannot be bought or sold. 1925- Legislation is changed to allow trawling off the coast of Santa Barbara within state waters. 1931- Commercially-caught California halibut less than 3.5 lbs (1.6 kg) dressed with the head on or 3 lbs (1.4 kg) dressed with the head off cannot be bought or sold (Recreationally-caught halibut may never be bought or sold). Up to 30 lbs (13.5 kg) of underweight California halibut can be retained by a commercial fisherman for personal use only. 1936- Market category for California halibut is established on landing receipts to distinguish from Pacific halibut. 1953- Waters off the Santa Barbara coast are closed to trawling again and trawling is prohibited in all state waters. 1968- Trawl nets are authorized between Point Sur and Cape San Martin in waters not less than 1 nm from the mainland shore. Trawl nets are also permitted between Point Arguello and El Capitan Point in Santa Barbara County in waters not less than 25 fathoms (fm) or 1 nm from shore. 1971- A minimum size limit of 22 inches total length (TL) for all recreationally-landed California halibut is established. 1971- A recreational bag limit of three fish north of Point Sur and five fish south of Point Sur is established. 1971- The California Halibut Trawl Grounds (CHTG) are established in southern California (Fish and Game Code sec. 8495). 1971- A 4-month trawl closure within the CHTG is implemented from February through May to protect spawning adults. 1972- A minimum mesh size of 7.5 inches is established for the cod end of trawl nets used within the CHTG. 1973- The 4-month trawl closure within the CHTG is changed to 15 March to 15 June. 1975- A minimum mesh size of 4.5 inches for the mesh of any part of a groundfish trawl net is established. This still applies to federal waters where halibut fishing occurs. 1979- A minimum size limit of 22 inches TL for all commercially-landed California halibut is established. For any licensed commercial fisherman, up to 30 pounds of halibut per day below minimum legal size may be possessed for personal use if taken incidentally in commercial fishing. 1985- Minimum mesh size for gill and trammel nets used to take halibut is increased to 8.5 inches (216 mm) between Point Dume (Los Angeles County) and Ragged Point (San Luis Obispo County). 1985- The number of halibut less than 22 inches total length that may be possessed by commercial fishermen for personal use is reduced to four fish. 1989- An 8.5-inch (216 mm) minimum mesh size for gill and trammel nets used to take halibut is adopted statewide. Gill and trammel nets are prohibited in Santa Monica Bay. 1989- The definition of the CHTG is amended and the 25-fm clause is removed. 1994- The Marine Resources Protection Zone is established by legislation: it prohibits the use of gill nets within 3 nm of shore south of Point Conception and within 1 nm from shore or 70 fm (whichever is less) around the Channel Islands. 2000- An emergency closure is established in waters less than 60 fm from Point Reyes to Point Arguello for the use of gill nets to take halibut. 2002- A permanent closure is established in waters less than 60 fm from Point Reyes to Point Arguello for the use of gill nets to take halibut. 2004- Senate Bill 1459 gives the Fish and Game Commission (Commission) authority over the management of the California halibut bottom trawl fishery. 2004- No halibut less than 22 inches total length may be taken, possessed or sold. 2004- SB 1459 closes all state waters to bottom trawling, with the exception of the CHTG. This includes historic trawl grounds for halibut within state waters of Monterey Bay which are greater than 3 nm from shore. However, the Monterey Bay trawl closure is not enforced until 2006. 2005- Due to SB 1459, 13 percent of the CHTG are closed to bottom trawling. These are the only state waters to date in which bottom trawling is allowed. 2006 A California halibut bottom trawl vessel permit is required for any commercial trawl vessel to land halibut taken in state waters, and in federal waters for landings exceeding 150 pounds 2008- Due to SB 1459, an additional section of the CHTG is closed to bottom trawling. 2009- Commission establishes regulations defining “light touch” trawl gear as the only trawl gear allowed within the CHTG." Frimodig et al. (2008) Appendix B shows other species caught (many bottom fish, sharks and rays).

  2. Describe the stock’s ecosystem functions, dependencies, and habitat types. California halibut occur in shallow nursery areas to depths up to 185m, though most catch is less than 60m. Juveniles eat invertebrates and larval fish. As they grow, they start eating anchovies, which become their main diet; but their diet also includes other small fish and shrimp (see full summary of diet and references in Haugen 1980; The California Halibut, Paralichthys californicus, Resource and Fisheries.pdf)

  3. Provide all relevant reference materials, such as assessments, research, and other analysis. Haugen et al. 1980: The California Halibut, Paralichthys californicus, Resource and Fisheries California Halibut Stock Assessment Background Information.pdf Central California Stock Assessment of California Halibut.pdf Historical Management Actions for California Halibut Fisheries.pdf Southern California Stock Assessment of California halibut.pdf Stock Assessment Summary for California Halibut.pdf The California Halibut, Paralichthys californicus, Resource and Fisheries.pdf


3 Fishery Characteristics

3.1 Longevity

Answered
Very short-lived (5 < maximum age < 7)
Short-lived (7 < maximum age < 10)
Moderate life span (10 < maximum age < 20)
Moderately long-lived (20 < maximum age < 40)
Long-lived (40 < maximum age < 80)
Very long-lived (80 < maximum age < 160)
Justification
The southern stock has a spawning depletion of 0.17; the northern stock has a spawning depletion of >1.2 (i.e. underexploited).

3.2 Stock depletion

Answered
Crashed (D < 0.05)
Very depleted (0.05 < D < 0.1)
Depleted (0.1 < D < 0.15)
Moderately depleted (0.15 < D < 0.3)
Healthy (0.3 < D < 0.5)
Underexploited (0.5 < D)
Justification
Steepness for stocks from 14 stocks of Pleuronectidae was estimated as 0.8.

3.3 Resilence

Answered
Not resilient (steepness < 0.3)
Low resilience (0.3 < steepness < 0.5)
Moderate resilence (0.5 < steepness < 0.7)
Resilient (0.7 < steepness < 0.9)
Very Resilient (0.9 < steepness)
Justification
No index of fishing effort or fishing mortality rate are available (that I could find anywhere). Catches for the central stock have been decreasing recently relative to an increasing abundance, suggesting an initial increase, then decrease to constant rate. Catches from the southern stock have steadily increased, though the population level has stayed relatively low and constant, suggesting either a stable or gradual increase.